Community as a Vague Operator: Epistemological Questions for a Critical Heuristics of Community Detection Algorithms

TL;DR

This paper critically examines the concept of 'community' in network science, framing it as a vague operator that influences social structures and proposing a reflexive, humble approach to community detection algorithms.

Contribution

It introduces the idea of 'community' as a vague operator and develops a critical heuristics framework for analyzing community detection methods.

Findings

Community acts as a vague operator influencing social relations.

Analysis of the Louvain algorithm reveals ambiguities and controversies.

Proposes a reflexive, humble approach to community detection.

Abstract

In this article, we aim to analyse the nature and epistemic consequences of what figures in network science as patterns of nodes and edges called 'communities'. Tracing these patterns as multi-faceted and ambivalent, we propose to describe the concept of community as a 'vague operator', a variant of Susan Leigh Star's notion of the boundary object, and propose that the ability to construct different modes of description that are both vague in some registers and hyper-precise in others, is core both to digital politics and the analysis of 'communities'. Engaging with these formations in terms drawn from mathematics and software studies enables a wider mapping of their formation. Disentangling different lineages in network science then allows us to contextualise the founding account of 'community' popularised by Michelle Girvan and Mark Newman in 2002. After studying one particular community detection algorithm, the widely-used 'Louvain algorithm', we comment on controversies arising with some of their more ambiguous applications. We argue that 'community' can act as a real abstraction with the power to reshape social relations such as producing echo chambers in social networking sites. To rework the epistemological terms of community detection and propose a reconsideration of vague operators, we draw on debates and propositions within the literature of network science to imagine a 'critical heuristics' that embraces partiality, epistemic humbleness, reflexivity and artificiality.