Token Classification for Disambiguating Medical Abbreviations
Mucahit Cevik, Sanaz Mohammad Jafari, Mitchell Myers, Savas Yildirim

TL;DR
This study investigates token classification methods, especially transformer models like SciBERT, for disambiguating medical abbreviations in clinical texts, showing improved performance over traditional text classification approaches.
Contribution
It demonstrates the effectiveness of token classification models, particularly SciBERT, for medical abbreviation disambiguation, outperforming text classification methods.
Findings
Token classification models outperform text classification in abbreviation disambiguation.
SciBERT shows strong performance on both datasets.
Postprocessing improves text classification results to match token classification.
Abstract
Abbreviations are unavoidable yet critical parts of the medical text. Using abbreviations, especially in clinical patient notes, can save time and space, protect sensitive information, and help avoid repetitions. However, most abbreviations might have multiple senses, and the lack of a standardized mapping system makes disambiguating abbreviations a difficult and time-consuming task. The main objective of this study is to examine the feasibility of token classification methods for medical abbreviation disambiguation. Specifically, we explore the capability of token classification methods to deal with multiple unique abbreviations in a single text. We use two public datasets to compare and contrast the performance of several transformer models pre-trained on different scientific and medical corpora. Our proposed token classification approach outperforms the more commonly used text…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBiomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
