TL;DR
This paper applies supervised machine learning to classify CHIME FRBs as repeating or non-repeating, revealing potential new repeating candidates and identifying key distinguishing features like brightness temperature and frequency bandwidth.
Contribution
It introduces a supervised machine learning approach to classify FRBs and suggests potential repeating FRBs among non-repeating ones, advancing understanding of FRB mechanisms.
Findings
Models predict FRB repetitiveness with high accuracy.
Brightness temperature and frequency bandwidth are key distinguishing features.
Potential new repeating FRBs identified among non-repeating ones.
Abstract
Observationally, the mysterious fast radio bursts (FRBs) are classified as repeating ones and apparently non-repeating ones. While repeating FRBs cannot be classified into the non-repeating group, it is unknown whether the apparently non-repeating FRBs are actually repeating FRBs whose repetitions are yet to be discovered, or whether they belong to another physically distinct type from the repeating ones. In a series of two papers, we attempt to disentangle this mystery with machine learning methods. In this first paper, we focus on an array of supervised machine learning methods. We train the machine learning algorithms with a fraction of the observed FRBs in the first CHIME/FRB catalog, telling them which ones are apparently non-repeating and which ones are repeating. We then let the trained models predict the repetitiveness of the rest of the FRB data with the observed parameters,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
