Unnecessary risks created by uncontrolled rocket reentries
Michael Byers, Ewan Wright, Aaron Boley, Cameron Byers

TL;DR
This paper examines the risks posed by uncontrolled rocket reentries, highlighting the increasing danger to populations worldwide and criticizing current risk thresholds as insufficient for addressing cumulative and high-impact risks.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of historical reentry data, models future risks, and highlights geopolitical disparities in reentry risk burdens.
Findings
Cumulative casualty risk from reentries is increasing over time.
Current risk thresholds are inadequate for high-impact scenarios.
Risk distribution disproportionately affects countries near the equator.
Abstract
In 2020, over 60% of launches to low Earth orbit resulted in one or more rocket bodies being abandoned in orbit and eventually returning to Earth in an uncontrolled manner. When they do so, between 20 and 40% of their mass survives the heat of atmospheric reentry. Many of the surviving pieces are heavy enough to pose serious risks to people, on land, at sea, and in airplanes. There is no international consensus on the acceptable level of risk from reentering space objects. This is sometimes a point of contention, such as when a 20 tonne Long March 5B core stage made an uncontrolled reentry in May 2021. Some regulators, including the US, France, and ESA, have implemented a 1 in 10,000 acceptable casualty risk (i.e., statistical threat to human life) threshold from reentering space objects. We argue that this threshold ignores the cumulative effect of the rapidly increasing number of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace exploration and regulation · Space Satellite Systems and Control
