Evaluating the Plausible Range of N2O Biosignatures on Exo-Earths: An Integrated Biogeochemical, Photochemical, and Spectral Modeling Approach
Edward W. Schwieterman, Stephanie L. Olson, Daria Pidhorodetska,, Christopher T. Reinhard, Ainsley Ganti, Thomas J. Fauchez, Sandra T., Bastelberger, Jaime S. Crouse, Andy Ridgwell, Timothy W. Lyons

TL;DR
This study models the plausible ranges of N2O biosignatures on exo-Earths, assessing their spectral detectability and potential false positives to aid future exoplanet biosignature searches.
Contribution
It integrates biogeochemical, photochemical, and spectral models to quantify maximum N2O levels and their detectability on Earth-like exoplanets around different star types.
Findings
Maximum N2O abundances vary with star type and flux.
Detectability of N2O features depends on flux and spectral resolution.
False positives can be distinguished through spectral and contextual analysis.
Abstract
Nitrous oxide (N2O) -- a product of microbial nitrogen metabolism -- is a compelling exoplanet biosignature gas with distinctive spectral features in the near- and mid-infrared, and only minor abiotic sources on Earth. Previous investigations of N2O as a biosignature have examined scenarios using Earthlike N2O mixing ratios or surface fluxes, or those inferred from Earth's geologic record. However, biological fluxes of N2O could be substantially higher, due to a lack of metal catalysts or if the last step of the denitrification metabolism that yields N2 from N2O had never evolved. Here, we use a global biogeochemical model coupled with photochemical and spectral models to systematically quantify the limits of plausible N2O abundances and spectral detectability for Earth analogs orbiting main-sequence (FGKM) stars. We examine N2O buildup over a range of oxygen conditions (1%-100% present…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
