Testing predictions of representation cost theory with CNNs
Charles Godfrey, Elise Bishoff, Myles Mckay, Davis Brown, Grayson, Jorgenson, Henry Kvinge, Eleanor Byler

TL;DR
This paper combines theoretical analysis and experiments to explain CNNs' sensitivity to low-frequency signals as a consequence of natural image frequency distributions, advancing understanding of model robustness.
Contribution
It introduces a novel theoretical framework analyzing CNN layer representations in frequency space to explain frequency sensitivity related to natural image statistics.
Findings
CNN sensitivity to low frequencies is due to natural image frequency distribution
Theoretical analysis in frequency space explains robustness characteristics
Experimental results support the frequency bias explanation
Abstract
It is widely acknowledged that trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have different levels of sensitivity to signals of different frequency. In particular, a number of empirical studies have documented CNNs sensitivity to low-frequency signals. In this work we show with theory and experiments that this observed sensitivity is a consequence of the frequency distribution of natural images, which is known to have most of its power concentrated in low-to-mid frequencies. Our theoretical analysis relies on representations of the layers of a CNN in frequency space, an idea that has previously been used to accelerate computations and study implicit bias of network training algorithms, but to the best of our knowledge has not been applied in the domain of model robustness.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNeural Networks and Applications · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Image and Signal Denoising Methods
