A length comparison theorem for geodesic currents
Jenya Sapir

TL;DR
This paper establishes a comparison between the geometry of geodesic currents and their associated length-minimizing metrics on thick components of a surface, providing new insights into their relationship.
Contribution
It proves that on thick components, the geometries of geodesic currents and their length-minimizing metrics are comparable up to a scalar, and characterizes these components using the length function.
Findings
Geometries of geodesic currents and metrics are comparable on thick components.
Thick components can be characterized solely by the length function of the current.
The comparison depends only on the current and the surface topology.
Abstract
We work with the space of geodesic currents on a closed surface of negative Euler characteristic. By prior work of the author with Sebastian Hensel, each filling geodesic current has a unique length-minimizing metric in Teichm\"uller space. In this paper, we show that, on so-called thick components of , the geometries of and are comparable, up to a scalar depending only on and the topology of . We also characterize thick components of the projection using only the length function of .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Geometry and complex manifolds · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
