A Benchmark for Multi-Modal Lidar SLAM with Ground Truth in GNSS-Denied Environments

TL;DR

This paper benchmarks state-of-the-art multi-modal lidar SLAM algorithms using an extended dataset with diverse sensors and ground truth sources, analyzing accuracy and resource use across platforms.

Contribution

It introduces a new multi-modal multi-lidar dataset with enhanced ground truth and evaluates various SLAM algorithms' performance and resource consumption.

Findings

SLAM algorithms perform variably across different sensor types.

The dataset includes diverse outdoor and indoor sequences with high-accuracy ground truth.

Resource utilization varies significantly between computational platforms.

Abstract

Lidar-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) approaches have obtained considerable success in autonomous robotic systems. This is in part owing to the high-accuracy of robust SLAM algorithms and the emergence of new and lower-cost lidar products. This study benchmarks current state-of-the-art lidar SLAM algorithms with a multi-modal lidar sensor setup showcasing diverse scanning modalities (spinning and solid-state) and sensing technologies, and lidar cameras, mounted on a mobile sensing and computing platform. We extend our previous multi-modal multi-lidar dataset with additional sequences and new sources of ground truth data. Specifically, we propose a new multi-modal multi-lidar SLAM-assisted and ICP-based sensor fusion method for generating ground truth maps. With these maps, we then match real-time pointcloud data using a natural distribution transform (NDT) method to obtain the ground truth with full 6 DOF pose estimation. This novel ground truth data leverages high-resolution spinning and solid-state lidars. We also include new open road sequences with GNSS-RTK data and additional indoor sequences with motion capture (MOCAP) ground truth, complementing the previous forest sequences with MOCAP data. We perform an analysis of the positioning accuracy achieved with ten different SLAM algorithm and lidar combinations. We also report the resource utilization in four different computational platforms and a total of five settings (Intel and Jetson ARM CPUs). Our experimental results show that current state-of-the-art lidar SLAM algorithms perform very differently for different types of sensors. More results, code, and the dataset can be found at: \href{https://github.com/TIERS/tiers-lidars-dataset-enhanced}{github.com/TIERS/tiers-lidars-dataset-enhanced.