MICROSCOPE mission: final results of the test of the Equivalence Principle
Pierre Touboul, Gilles M\'etris, Manuel Rodrigues, Joel Berg\'e, Alain, Robert, Quentin Baghi, Yves Andr\'e, Judica\"el Bedouet, Damien Boulanger,, Stefanie Bremer, Patrice Carle, Ratana Chhun, Bruno Christophe, Valerio, Cipolla, Thibault Damour, Pascale Danto, Louis Demange

TL;DR
The MICROSCOPE mission tested the Weak Equivalence Principle with unprecedented precision, finding no violation and setting strong constraints on potential differences between inertial and gravitational masses.
Contribution
This study provides the first high-precision experimental test of the WEP in space using differential accelerometers over a two-and-a-half-year mission.
Findings
No violation of the WEP detected within the measurement sensitivity.
E"otv"os parameter constrained to approximately 2.3×10^{-15}.
Systematic uncertainties characterized and corrected for thermal and transient effects.
Abstract
The MICROSCOPE mission was designed to test the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP), stating the equality between the inertial and the gravitational masses, with a precision of in terms of the E\"otv\"os ratio . Its experimental test consisted of comparing the accelerations undergone by two collocated test masses of different compositions as they orbited the Earth, by measuring the electrostatic forces required to keep them in equilibrium. This was done with ultra-sensitive differential electrostatic accelerometers onboard a drag-free satellite. The mission lasted two and a half years, cumulating five-months-worth of science free-fall data, two thirds with a pair of test masses of different compositions -- Titanium and Platinum alloys -- and the last third with a reference pair of test masses of the same composition -- Platinum. We summarize the data analysis, with an…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
