First measurements and upgrade plans of the MAGIC intensity interferometer
Juan Cortina, V. A. Acciari, A. Biland, E. Colombo, C. da Costa, C., Delgado, C. Diaz, M. Fiori, D. Fink, T. Hassan, I. Jimenez-Martinez, E., Lyard, M. Mariotti, G. Martinez, R. Mirzoyan, G. Naletto, M. Polo, N., Produit, J. J. Rodriguez, T. Schweizer, R. Walter

TL;DR
This paper discusses the first measurements and upgrade plans for the MAGIC intensity interferometer, which uses Cherenkov telescopes to measure stellar diameters with high sensitivity and plans to expand with additional telescopes for improved coverage.
Contribution
It introduces a novel intensity interferometer setup using MAGIC telescopes with GPU-based real-time correlator and plans to integrate CTA telescopes for enhanced capabilities.
Findings
Achieved stellar diameter measurements with 10x better sensitivity than 1970s
Implemented active mirror control for simultaneous multi-baseline measurements
Plans to incorporate CTA LST-1 to improve sensitivity and u-v coverage
Abstract
The two MAGIC 17-m diameter Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes have been equipped to work also as an intensity interferometer with a deadtime-free, 4-channel, GPU-based, real-time correlator. Operating with baselines between approx. 40 and 90 m the MAGIC interferometer is able to measure stellar diameters of 0.5-1 mas in the 400-440 nm wavelength range with a sensitivity roughly 10 times better than that achieved in the 1970s by the Narrabri Stellar Intensity Interferometer. Besides, active mirror control allows to split the primary mirrors into sub-mirrors. This allows to make simultaneous calibration measurements of the zero-baseline correlation or to simultaneously collect six baselines below 17 m with almost arbitrary orientation, corresponding to angular scales of approx. 1-50 mas. We plan to perform test observations adding the nearby Cherenkov Telescope Array (CTA) LST-1 23…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
