Grothendieck's point of view and complexity in the black hole paradox
Andrei T. Patrascu

TL;DR
This paper explores a novel approach to the black hole information paradox by integrating Grothendieck's categorical perspective with complexity dynamics, suggesting that entanglement alone is insufficient for explaining information retrieval.
Contribution
It introduces a categorical framework incorporating Grothendieck's ideas to extend entanglement entropy, offering a new direction for understanding black hole information paradox.
Findings
Proposes a categorical model for entanglement and complexity.
Suggests complexity dynamics as an alternative to entanglement.
Provides a new mathematical perspective on black hole information retrieval.
Abstract
These are some speculations on how Grothendieck's point of view and the idea of complexity dynamics can come together in the problem of explaining the black hole information paradox. They are neither complete, nor final, but can seem like a new direction of research. If read as such they could prove useful to some researchers. The basic idea is that entanglement alone cannot fully account for the information extraction in black hole contexts. Complexity has been proposed as an alternative but remains a vague concept. I employ Grothendieck's point of view to expand the idea of entanglement entropy to a categorical context in which the objects (states) and their maps are considered together and the map space has additional topological and geometric structure that intermingles with the object set of the category via Sieves, Sheafs, and Toposes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
