The Fungibility of Non-Fungible Tokens: A Quantitative Analysis of ERC-721 Metadata
Sarah Barrington, Nick Merrill

TL;DR
This paper investigates the properties that determine NFT value, focusing on permanence, and finds that nearly half of ERC-721 tokens may lack this key attribute, impacting market perceptions and valuation.
Contribution
It introduces a quantitative measure of NFT permanence and applies it to Ethereum data, revealing significant variability in NFT quality.
Findings
45% of ERC-721 tokens lack permanence
Proposes a measure to assess NFT permanence
Highlights potential overvaluation in NFT market
Abstract
Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), digital certificates of ownership for virtual art, have until recently been traded on a highly lucrative and speculative market. Yet, an emergence of misconceptions, along with a sustained market downtime, are calling the value of NFTs into question. This project (1) describes three properties that any valuable NFT should possess (permanence, immutability and uniqueness), (2) creates a quantitative summary of permanence as an initial criteria, and (3) tests our measures on 6 months of NFTs on the Ethereum blockchain, finding 45% of ERC721 tokens in our corpus do not satisfy this initial criteria. Our work could help buyers and marketplaces identify and warn users against purchasing NFTs that may be overvalued.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsArt History and Market Analysis · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
