TL;DR
This study compares local and global machine learning methods for groundwater level forecasting using a new dataset, finding that global models trained on past levels and rainfall data yield the best predictions.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new dataset of groundwater levels and compares local versus global forecasting methods, highlighting the effectiveness of global models with exogenous variables.
Findings
Global forecasting methods outperform local ones.
Rainfall data improves prediction accuracy.
Global models trained on past levels and rainfall are most effective.
Abstract
Groundwater level prediction is an applied time series forecasting task with important social impacts to optimize water management as well as preventing some natural disasters: for instance, floods or severe droughts. Machine learning methods have been reported in the literature to achieve this task, but they are only focused on the forecast of the groundwater level at a single location. A global forecasting method aims at exploiting the groundwater level time series from a wide range of locations to produce predictions at a single place or at several places at a time. Given the recent success of global forecasting methods in prestigious competitions, it is meaningful to assess them on groundwater level prediction and see how they are compared to local methods. In this work, we created a dataset of 1026 groundwater level time series. Each time series is made of daily measurements of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
