TL;DR
This paper analyzes the semantic content of alt texts in HCI publications' figures, revealing gaps in descriptive quality and providing a dataset to improve alt text generation for better accessibility.
Contribution
It introduces a dataset of alt texts from HCI papers and offers insights and recommendations to enhance alt text quality for scientific figures.
Findings
Only 50% of alt texts mention extrema or outliers.
31% of alt texts describe major trends or comparisons.
The dataset can be used to develop tools for better alt text generation.
Abstract
Figures in scientific publications contain important information and results, and alt text is needed for blind and low vision readers to engage with their content. We conduct a study to characterize the semantic content of alt text in HCI publications based on a framework introduced by Lundgard and Satyanarayan. Our study focuses on alt text for graphs, charts, and plots extracted from HCI and accessibility publications; we focus on these communities due to the lack of alt text in papers published outside of these disciplines. We find that the capacity of author-written alt text to fulfill blind and low vision user needs is mixed; for example, only 50% of alt texts in our sample contain information about extrema or outliers, and only 31% contain information about major trends or comparisons conveyed by the graph. We release our collected dataset of author-written alt text, and outline…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
