Hypothesis Testing for Detecting Outlier Evaluators
Li Xu, Molin Wang

TL;DR
This paper introduces a two-stage statistical method to identify outlier evaluators in epidemiological studies, improving the detection of inconsistent measurements among professionals.
Contribution
It proposes a novel two-stage procedure combining regression modeling and hypothesis testing to effectively detect outlier evaluators in epidemiological data.
Findings
High true positive and negative rates in simulation studies
Effective detection of outlier audiologists in real data
Method improves evaluator consistency assessment
Abstract
In epidemiological studies, very often, evaluators obtain measurements of disease outcomes for study participants. In this paper, we propose a two-stage procedure for detecting outlier evaluators. In the first stage, a regression model is fitted to obtain the evaluators' effects. The outlier evaluators are considered as those with different effects compared with the normal evaluators. In the second stage, stepwise hypothesis testings are performed to detect outlier evaluators. The true positive rate and true negative rate of the proposed procedure are assessed in a simulation study. We apply the proposed method to detect potential outlier audiologists among the audiologists who measured hearing threshold levels of the participants in the Audiology Assessment Arm of the Conservation of Hearing Study, which is an epidemiological study for examining risk factors of hearing loss.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
