The Brunn--Minkowski inequality implies the CD condition in weighted Riemannian manifolds
Mattia Magnabosco, Lorenzo Portinale, Tommaso Rossi

TL;DR
This paper proves that in weighted Riemannian manifolds, the Brunn--Minkowski inequality is equivalent to the curvature dimension condition, enabling characterization without optimal transport or differential structures.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence between BM(K,N) and CD(K,N) in weighted Riemannian manifolds, removing the need for optimal transport or differential tools.
Findings
BM(K,N) is equivalent to CD(K,N) in weighted Riemannian manifolds
Characterization of curvature dimension condition without optimal transport
Extension of the Brunn--Minkowski inequality implications
Abstract
The curvature dimension condition CD(K,N), pioneered by Sturm and Lott--Villani, is a synthetic notion of having curvature bounded below and dimension bounded above, in the non-smooth setting. This condition implies a suitable generalization of the Brunn--Minkowski inequality, denoted by BM(K,N). In this paper, we address the converse implication in the setting of weighted Riemannian manifolds, proving that BM(K,N) is in fact equivalent to CD(K,N). Our result allows to characterize the curvature dimension condition without using neither the optimal transport nor the differential structure of the manifold.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
