First results on QCD+QED with C* boundary conditions
Lucius Bushnaq, Isabel Campos, Marco Catillo, Alessandro Cotellucci,, Madeleine Dale, Patrick Fritzsch, Jens L\"ucke, Marina Krsti\'c Marinkovi\'c,, Agostino Patella, Nazario Tantalo

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates the feasibility of including QED and isospin-breaking effects in lattice QCD calculations using C* boundary conditions, showing initial results for meson and baryon masses across different ensembles.
Contribution
It presents the first results on QCD+QED with C* boundary conditions, including gauge ensemble generation, tuning strategies, and a cost analysis for such simulations.
Findings
Successful computation of meson and baryon masses with QED effects
Implementation of C* boundary conditions preserves locality and gauge invariance
Analysis of computational cost and tuning strategies for QCD+QED simulations
Abstract
Accounting for isospin-breaking corrections is critical for achieving subpercent precision in lattice computations of hadronic observables. A way to include QED and strong-isospin-breaking corrections in lattice QCD calculations is to impose C boundary conditions in space. Here, we demonstrate the computation of a selection of meson and baryon masses on two QCD and five QCD+QED gauge ensembles in this setup, which preserves locality, gauge and translational invariance all through the calculation. The generation of the gauge ensembles is performed for two volumes, and three different values of the renormalized fine-structure constant at the U-symmetric point, corresponding to the SU(3)-symmetric QCD in the two ensembles where the electromagnetic coupling is turned off. We also present our tuning strategy and, to the extent possible, a cost analysis of the simulations with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
