Euclid preparation XXVI. The Euclid Morphology Challenge. Towards structural parameters for billions of galaxies
Euclid Collaboration: H.Bretonni\`ere, U.Kuchner, M.Huertas-Company,, E.Merlin, M.Castellano, D.Tuccillo, F.Buitrago, C.J.Conselice, A.Boucaud,, B.H\"au{\ss}ler, M.K\"ummel, W.G.Hartley, A.Alvarez Ayllon, E.Bertin,, F.Ferrari, L.Ferreira, R.Gavazzi, D.Hern\'andez-Lang

TL;DR
The Euclid Morphology Challenge assesses the accuracy of galaxy structural parameter measurements from simulated Euclid images, demonstrating that robust measurements are achievable for hundreds of millions of galaxies with current methods.
Contribution
This paper evaluates and compares the performance of five state-of-the-art galaxy morphology fitting codes on simulated Euclid data, highlighting their reliability and limitations.
Findings
All methods achieve reliable measurements down to magnitude 23 for one-component galaxies.
Performance degrades by a factor of 3 on non-analytic galaxy profiles.
Robust structural parameters will be available for at least 400 million galaxies from Euclid.
Abstract
The various Euclid imaging surveys will become a reference for studies of galaxy morphology by delivering imaging over an unprecedented area of 15 000 square degrees with high spatial resolution. In order to understand the capabilities of measuring morphologies from Euclid-detected galaxies and to help implement measurements in the pipeline, we have conducted the Euclid Morphology Challenge, which we present in two papers. While the companion paper by Merlin et al. focuses on the analysis of photometry, this paper assesses the accuracy of the parametric galaxy morphology measurements in imaging predicted from within the Euclid Wide Survey. We evaluate the performance of five state-of-the-art surface-brightness-fitting codes DeepLeGATo, Galapagos-2, Morfometryka, Profit and SourceXtractor++ on a sample of about 1.5 million simulated galaxies resembling reduced observations with the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
