Probing the link between quenching and morphological evolution
Ioanna Koutsouridou, Andrea Cattaneo

TL;DR
This study compares halo and black-hole quenching models in galaxy formation, finding that BH quenching better matches observed galaxy passive fractions and morphologies, and highlights the role of minor mergers and feedback regimes.
Contribution
It demonstrates that black-hole quenching models, incorporating minor mergers and feedback effects, better explain galaxy passive fractions and morphology than halo quenching models.
Findings
BH quenching aligns with passive galaxy fractions and morphology.
Minor mergers are essential for supermassive BH growth in quenching.
BH growth efficiency decreases at low masses, supporting supernova feedback influence.
Abstract
We use a semianalytic model of galaxy formation to compare the predictions of two quenching scenarios: halo quenching and black-hole (BH) quenching. After calibrating both models so that they fit the mass function of galaxies, BH quenching is in better agreement with the fraction of passive galaxies as a function of stellar mass and with the galaxy morphological distribution on a star-formation-rate vs. diagram. Besides this main finding, there are two other results from this research. First, a successful BH-quenching model requires that minor mergers contribute to the growth of supermassive BHs. If galaxies that reach high through repeated minor mergers are not quenched, there are too many blue galaxies at high masses. Second, the growth of BHs in mergers must become less efficient at low masses in order to reproduce the -- relation and the passive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
