
TL;DR
This paper introduces the concept of exact-$m$-majority terms in algebraic structures and explores their implications for the properties of varieties, such as congruence modularity, distributivity, and permutability.
Contribution
It defines exact-$m$-majority terms and investigates their role in characterizing algebraic varieties, revealing that certain types imply congruence modularity but not distributivity or permutability.
Findings
Existence of exact-$m$-majority terms implies congruence modularity.
For specific $n$ and $m$, such terms do not imply distributivity or permutability.
The concept helps distinguish between different algebraic property implications.
Abstract
We say that an idempotent term is an exact--majority term if evaluates to , whenever the element occurs exactly times in the arguments of , and all the other arguments are equal. If and some variety has an -ary exact--majority term, then is congruence modular. For certain values of and , for example, and , the existence of an -ary exact--majority term neither implies congruence distributivity, nor congruence permutability.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Logic · semigroups and automata theory · Rings, Modules, and Algebras
