Digital currency hardware wallets and the essence of money
Geoffrey Goodell

TL;DR
This paper critiques current digital currency hardware wallet designs, emphasizing the importance of holding digital assets independently of custodians and proposing alternative architectures for more efficient, user-centric digital payments.
Contribution
It challenges existing assumptions about digital wallets, advocating for designs that enable offline storage and online transactions without relying on trusted hardware.
Findings
Current proposals ignore the core nature of digital money.
Account-based and hardware-dependent solutions have significant limitations.
Offline storage with online transactions offers a better approach.
Abstract
Many proposals for the design and implementation of digital wallets assume that the purpose of the wallet is to enable offline payments via custodial accounts, ignoring the real problems faced by individuals and businesses that engage in retail payments, such as the anticompetitive behaviour of payment platforms and the decline of cash. More importantly, the proposals ignore the raison d'\^etre of digital currency as a kind of digital money that can be held independently of custodians. Finally, the proposals demonstrate a profound lack of imagination about the nature of digital money and the devices that could be used to hold, manage, and exchange it. From these presumptions flows a set of architectural requirements that stifle the promise of digital currency to deliver novel and efficient ways to exchange value in the digital economy. In this article, we critically assess the essential…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
