Properties of the Prompt Optical Counterpart Arising from the Cooling of Electrons in Gamma-Ray Bursts
A.D. Panaitescu, W.T. Vestrand

TL;DR
This paper models the properties of optical counterparts to gamma-ray bursts caused by electron cooling, predicting their timing, brightness, and variability signatures, and comparing these with observational data.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed model of prompt optical counterparts from electron cooling in GRBs, linking their characteristics to physical parameters and observational signatures.
Findings
True POC pulses last as long as the GRB pulse.
Delayed optical counterparts last as long as the transit time.
Dimmer POCs are associated with harder GRB spectra.
Abstract
This work extends a contemporaneous effort (Panaitescu & Vestrand 2022) to study the properties of the lower-energy counterpart synchrotron emission produced by the cooling of relativistic Gamma-Ray Burst (GRB) electrons through radiation (synchrotron and self-Compton) emission and adiabatic losses. We derive the major characteristics (pulse duration, lag-time after burst, brightness relative to the burst) of the Prompt Optical Counterpart (POC) accompanying GRBs. Depending on the magnetic field life-time, duration of electron injection, and electron transit-time Dto from hard X-ray (GRB) to optical emitting energies, a (true) POC may appear during the GRB pulse (of duration dtg) or after (delayed OC). The signature of counterparts arising from the cooling of GRB electrons is that true POC pulses (Dto < dtg) last as long as the corresponding GRB pulse (dto ~ dtg) while delayed OC pulses…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Astro and Planetary Science
