Taking the Intentional Stance Seriously, or "Intending" to Improve Cognitive Systems
Will Bridewell

TL;DR
This paper discusses the importance of integrating human-like mental states, especially intentions, into cognitive systems to better align AI behavior with human expectations and improve user experience.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the mental state 'intention' and offers methodological suggestions for embedding such states into AI systems.
Findings
Analyzing 'intention' reveals key challenges in AI understanding.
Methodological approaches can facilitate the integration of mental states.
Aligning AI with folk-psychological theories improves human-AI interaction.
Abstract
Finding claims that researchers have made considerable progress in artificial intelligence over the last several decades is easy. However, our everyday interactions with cognitive systems (e.g., Siri, Alexa, DALL-E) quickly move from intriguing to frustrating. One cause of those frustrations rests in a mismatch between the expectations we have due to our inherent, folk-psychological theories and the real limitations we experience with existing computer programs. The software does not understand that people have goals, beliefs about how to achieve those goals, and intentions to act accordingly. One way to align cognitive systems with our expectations is to imbue them with mental states that mirror those we use to predict and explain human behavior. This paper discusses these concerns and illustrates the challenge of following this route by analyzing the mental state 'intention.' That…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics and Social Impacts of AI · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
MethodsALIGN
