Facilitating Change Implementation for Continuous ML-Safety Assurance
Chih-Hong Cheng, Nguyen Anh Vu Doan, Balahari Balu, Franziska, Schwaiger, Emmanouil Seferis, Simon Burton, Yassine Qamsane, Ankit Shukla,, Yinchong Yang, Zhiliang Wu, Andreas Hapfelmeier, Ingo Thon

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for integrating safety assurance into continuous machine learning deployment by linking safety argumentation with quantitative metrics, demonstrated on an autonomous vehicle system.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to safety assurance that combines semantic safety argumentation with quantitative metrics for continuous ML system deployment.
Findings
Semantic tags enhance safety argumentation clarity
Quantitative metrics enable impact analysis of evidence
Application to autonomous vehicle braking system demonstrates practicality
Abstract
We propose a method for deploying a safety-critical machine-learning component into continuously evolving environments where an increased degree of automation in the engineering process is desired. We associate semantic tags with the safety case argumentation and turn each piece of evidence into a quantitative metric or a logic formula. With proper tool support, the impact can be characterized by a query over the safety argumentation tree to highlight evidence turning invalid. The concept is exemplified using a vision-based emergency braking system of an autonomous guided vehicle for factory automation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy · Semantic Web and Ontologies · Software Reliability and Analysis Research
