Naive Newsvendor Adjustments: Are They Always Detrimental?
Congzheng Liu, Adam N. Letchford, Ivan Svetunkov

TL;DR
This paper examines the effects of naive judgmental adjustments like demand chasing and pull-to-centre in newsvendor problems, showing they can sometimes be beneficial and proposing a heuristic for tuning these adjustments.
Contribution
It analyzes naive adjustment strategies in newsvendor problems, demonstrating their potential benefits and introducing a heuristic for parameter tuning.
Findings
Naive adjustments can be beneficial under certain conditions.
Experiments confirm the usefulness of demand chasing and pull-to-centre.
A heuristic algorithm for tuning adjustment parameters is proposed.
Abstract
Newsvendor problems are an important and much-studied topic in stochastic inventory control. One strand of the literature on newsvendor problems is concerned with the fact that practitioners often make judgemental adjustments to the theoretically "optimal" order quantities. Although judgemental adjustment is sometimes beneficial, two specific kinds of adjustment are normally considered to be particularly naive: demand chasing and pull-to-centre. We discuss how these adjustments work in practice and what they imply in a variety of settings. We argue that even such naive adjustments can be useful under certain conditions. This is confirmed by experiments on simulated data. Finally, we propose a heuristic algorithm for "tuning" the adjustment parameters in practice.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSupply Chain and Inventory Management · Advanced Queuing Theory Analysis
