Investigating and Mitigating Failure Modes in Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINNs)
Shamsulhaq Basir

TL;DR
This paper identifies challenges in training physics-informed neural networks due to non-convex loss landscapes and gradient contamination, and proposes a novel method to improve convergence and handle complex PDE solutions.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new approach that bypasses high-order derivatives, reduces search space, and employs a dual formulation with adaptive learning rates for better PDE solving.
Findings
Improved convergence in solving PDEs with PINNs.
Effective handling of non-smooth solutions.
Enhanced focus on complex domain regions.
Abstract
This paper explores the difficulties in solving partial differential equations (PDEs) using physics-informed neural networks (PINNs). PINNs use physics as a regularization term in the objective function. However, a drawback of this approach is the requirement for manual hyperparameter tuning, making it impractical in the absence of validation data or prior knowledge of the solution. Our investigations of the loss landscapes and backpropagated gradients in the presence of physics reveal that existing methods produce non-convex loss landscapes that are hard to navigate. Our findings demonstrate that high-order PDEs contaminate backpropagated gradients and hinder convergence. To address these challenges, we introduce a novel method that bypasses the calculation of high-order derivative operators and mitigates the contamination of backpropagated gradients. Consequently, we reduce the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsModel Reduction and Neural Networks · Neural Networks and Applications · Machine Learning and ELM
