Will It Blend? Mixing Training Paradigms & Prompting for Argument Quality Prediction
Michiel van der Meer, Myrthe Reuver, Urja Khurana, Lea Krause, Selene, B\'aez Santamar\'ia

TL;DR
This paper explores combining different training methods and prompt engineering with GPT-3 to improve argument quality prediction, demonstrating that mixed approaches outperform single models in various aspects.
Contribution
It introduces a novel combination of training paradigms and prompt engineering techniques for argument quality prediction using large language models.
Findings
Mixed training paradigms outperform single models.
Prompt engineering with GPT-3 excels in argument validity prediction.
Multi-paradigm training best estimates argument novelty.
Abstract
This paper describes our contributions to the Shared Task of the 9th Workshop on Argument Mining (2022). Our approach uses Large Language Models for the task of Argument Quality Prediction. We perform prompt engineering using GPT-3, and also investigate the training paradigms multi-task learning, contrastive learning, and intermediate-task training. We find that a mixed prediction setup outperforms single models. Prompting GPT-3 works best for predicting argument validity, and argument novelty is best estimated by a model trained using all three training paradigms.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSoftware Engineering Research · Topic Modeling · Natural Language Processing Techniques
Methods{Dispute@FaQ-s}How to file a dispute with Expedia? · Attention Is All You Need · Linear Layer · Dense Connections · Weight Decay · Layer Normalization · 15 Ways to Contact How can i speak to someone at Delta Airlines · Cosine Annealing · Multi-Head Attention · Attention Dropout
