Translationally Invariant Constraint Optimization Problems

TL;DR

This paper characterizes the computational complexity of translationally invariant constraint satisfaction problems on 2D grids, showing they are complete for the class FP^NEXP, and extends previous decision problem results to function problems.

Contribution

It provides a tight complexity classification for translationally invariant CSPs, strengthening prior NEXP-completeness results from decision to function versions, and introduces new hardness results for approximation.

Findings

The problem is FP^NEXP-complete.

Approximation within Ω(N^{1/4}) is NEXP-hard.

Decision problem of parity of optimal cost is P^NEXP-complete.

Abstract

We study the complexity of classical constraint satisfaction problems on a 2D grid. Specifically, we consider the complexity of function versions of such problems, with the additional restriction that the constraints are translationally invariant, namely, the variables are located at the vertices of a 2D grid and the constraint between every pair of adjacent variables is the same in each dimension. The only input to the problem is thus the size of the grid. This problem is equivalent to one of the most interesting problems in classical physics, namely, computing the lowest energy of a classical system of particles on the grid. We provide a tight characterization of the complexity of this problem, and show that it is complete for the class $FP^{NEXP}$. Gottesman and Irani (FOCS 2009) also studied classical translationally-invariant constraint satisfaction problems; they show that the problem of deciding whether the cost of the optimal solution is below a given threshold is NEXP-complete. Our result is thus a strengthening of their result from the decision version to the function version of the problem. Our result can also be viewed as a generalization to the translationally invariant setting, of Krentel's famous result from 1988, showing that the function version of SAT is complete for the class $FP^{NP}$. An essential ingredient in the proof is a study of the complexity of a gapped variant of the problem. We show that it is NEXP-hard to approximate the cost of the optimal assignment to within an additive error of $\Omega(N^{1/4})$, for an $N \times N$ grid. To the best of our knowledge, no gapped result is known for CSPs on the grid, even in the non-translationally invariant case. As a byproduct of our results, we also show that a decision version of the optimization problem which asks whether the cost of the optimal assignment is odd or even is also complete for $P^{NEXP}$.