Proofs of Proof-of-Stake with Sublinear Complexity
Shresth Agrawal, Joachim Neu, Ertem Nusret Tas, Dionysis Zindros

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel proof-of-stake superlight client with sublinear bootstrapping complexity, significantly improving efficiency and enabling trustless cross-chain verification in Ethereum and other PoS systems.
Contribution
It presents a new proof-of-stake verification method using Merkle trees and a bisection game, achieving asymptotically logarithmic complexity and practical performance improvements.
Findings
9x faster bootstrap time compared to Ethereum's light client
180x reduction in communication overhead
30x decrease in energy consumption during bootstrap
Abstract
Popular Ethereum wallets (like MetaMask) entrust centralized infrastructure providers (e.g., Infura) to run the consensus client logic on their behalf. As a result, these wallets are light-weight and high-performant, but come with security risks. A malicious provider can mislead the wallet by faking payments and balances, or censoring transactions. On the other hand, light clients, which are not in popular use today, allow decentralization, but are concretely inefficient, often with asymptotically linear bootstrapping complexity. This poses a dilemma between decentralization and performance. We design, implement, and evaluate a new proof-of-stake (PoS) superlight client with concretely efficient and asymptotically logarithmic bootstrapping complexity. Our proofs of proof-of-stake (PoPoS) take the form of a Merkle tree of PoS epochs. The verifier enrolls the provers in a bisection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlockchain Technology Applications and Security · Cryptography and Data Security · Cloud Data Security Solutions
