Simultaneous measurement of muon neutrino $\nu_\mu$ charged-current single $\pi^+$ production in CH, C, H$_2$O, Fe, and Pb targets in MINERvA
A. Bercellie, K.A. Kroma-Wiley, S. Akhter, Z. Ahmad Dar, F. Akbar, V., Ansari, M. V. Ascencio, M. Sajjad Athar, L. Bellantoni, M. Betancourt, A., Bodek, J. L. Bonilla, A. Bravar, H. Budd, G. Caceres, T. Cai, G.A. D\'iaz, H., da Motta, S.A. Dytman, J. Felix, L. Fields, A. Filkins

TL;DR
This paper reports detailed measurements of muon neutrino charged-current single pion production across various nuclear targets, revealing discrepancies with existing models and providing crucial data for neutrino oscillation research.
Contribution
It provides high-statistics differential cross sections for $ u_rac12$ interactions on multiple targets, highlighting model deficiencies in nuclear effects and scaling predictions.
Findings
Suppression of cross section at low $Q^2$ observed
Enhancement of low $T_rac12$ in data compared to models
Cross-section ratios for heavy nuclei differ from predictions
Abstract
Neutrino-induced charged-current single production in the resonance region is of considerable interest to accelerator-based neutrino oscillation experiments. In this work, high statistics differential cross sections are reported for the semi-exclusive reaction nucleon(s) on scintillator, carbon, water, iron, and lead targets recorded by MINERvA using a wide-band beam with ~GeV. Suppression of the cross section at low and enhancement of low are observed in both light and heavy nuclear targets compared to phenomenological models used in current neutrino interaction generators. The cross-section ratios for iron and lead compared to CH across the kinematic variables probed are 0.8 and 0.5 respectively, a scaling which is also not predicted by current generators.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
