The Geometry of the Bing Involution
Michael Freedman, Michael Starbird

TL;DR
This paper investigates the wildness of Bing's 1952 involution on the 3-sphere, proving that any topologically conjugate involution must have a nearly exponential modulus of continuity, revealing extreme distortion properties.
Contribution
The paper establishes a lower bound on the modulus of continuity for involutions topologically conjugate to Bing's, showing it must be nearly exponential, and introduces the concept of inherent modulus of continuity.
Findings
Any conjugate involution has nearly exponential modulus of continuity.
Bing's original involution has a modulus exceeding a square-root exponential.
For any growth function, a corresponding involution with faster modulus growth exists.
Abstract
In 1952 Bing published a wild (not topologically conjugate to smooth) involution of the 3-sphere . But exactly how wild is it, analytically? We prove that any involution , topologically conjugate to , must have a nearly exponential modulus of continuity. Specifically, given any , there exists a sequence of 's converging to zero, , and points with dist, yet dist, where , and dist is the usual Riemannian distance on . In particular, stretches distance much more than a Lipschitz function () or a H\"{o}lder function (, ). Bing's original construction and known alternatives (see text) for have a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
