Causal Modifications of Gravity and Their Observational Bounds
Mark P. Hertzberg, Jacob A. Litterer, Neil Shah

TL;DR
This paper investigates causal scalar field models with non-canonical kinetic terms as modifications to gravity, analyzing their observational bounds from astrophysical systems while avoiding superluminality and acausality issues.
Contribution
It introduces subluminal, causal scalar field models with nonlinear kinetic terms and derives observational constraints from binary pulsars, neutron stars, and merger events.
Findings
Constraints from binary pulsar precession
Bounds from neutron star hydrostatic equilibrium
Limits on scalar radiation during mergers
Abstract
Since general relativity is the unique theory of massless spin 2 particles at large distances, the most reasonable way to have significant modifications is to introduce one or more light scalars that mediate a new long-range force. Most existing studies of such scalars invoke models that exhibit some kind of "screening" at short distances to hide the force from solar system tests. However, as is well known, such modifications also exhibit superluminality, which can be interpreted as a form of acausality. In this work we explore explicitly subluminal and causal scalar field models. In particular, we study a conformally coupled scalar , with a small coupling to matter to obey solar system bounds, and a non-canonical kinetic term () that obeys all subluminality constraints and is hyperbolic. We consider that is canonical for small , but beyond…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
