Multi-probe analysis of the galaxy cluster CL J1226.9+3332: Hydrostatic mass and hydrostatic-to-lensing bias
M. Mu\~noz-Echeverr\'ia, J. F. Mac\'ias-P\'erez, G. W. Pratt, R. Adam,, P. Ade, H. Ajeddig, P. Andr\'e, M. Arnaud, E. Artis, H. Aussel, I., Bartalucci, A. Beelen, A. Beno\^it, S. Berta, L. Bing, O. Bourrion, M. Calvo,, A. Catalano, M. De Petris, F.-X. D\'esert, S. Doyle

TL;DR
This study combines multi-instrument observations to accurately estimate the hydrostatic mass of galaxy cluster CL J1226.9+3332 at high redshift and assesses the bias between hydrostatic and lensing mass estimates, crucial for cosmology.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of hydrostatic mass estimation for a high-redshift galaxy cluster using multiple data sets and evaluates the hydrostatic-to-lensing mass bias.
Findings
Hydrostatic mass estimates are robust and agree with literature.
Mass profile shape differences significantly affect R500 mass calculations.
Hydrostatic-to-lensing bias ranges from 0.7 to 1, influenced by data and models.
Abstract
The precise estimation of the mass of galaxy clusters is a major issue for cosmology. Large galaxy cluster surveys rely on scaling laws that relate cluster observables to their masses. From the high resolution observations of ~ 45 galaxy clusters with NIKA2 and XMM-Newton instruments, the NIKA2 SZ Large Program should provide an accurate scaling relation between the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect and the hydrostatic mass. In this paper, we present an exhaustive analysis of the hydrostatic mass of the well known galaxy cluster CL J1226.9+3332, the highest-redshift cluster in the NIKA2 SZ Large Program at z = 0.89. We combine the NIKA2 observations with thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich data from NIKA, Bolocam and MUSTANG instruments and XMM-Newton X-ray observations and test the impact of the systematic effects on the mass reconstruction. We conclude that slight differences in the shape of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
