The Antinomy of the Liar

TL;DR

This paper offers a dialetheic solution to the Antinomy of the Liar, addressing related paradoxes and objections, and argues that accepting this solution requires rejecting Curry's paradox.

Contribution

It introduces a dialetheic approach to the Liar paradox and analyzes objections related to Curry's paradox, providing a novel resolution framework.

Findings

The dialetheic solution successfully resolves the Liar paradox.

Accepting the solution implies rejecting Curry's paradox.

Arguments are discussed defending the rejection of Curry's argument.

Abstract

I present a dialetheic solution to the Antinomy of the Liar and I evaluate the objection that, if the argument in Curry's paradox is valid, accepting this solution forces us to accept an analogous solution to Curry's, which I show to be unacceptable. Thus, to accept this solution, we have to reject the argument in Curry's. I discuss some arguments defending this view.