
TL;DR
This paper offers a dialetheic solution to the Antinomy of the Liar, addressing related paradoxes and objections, and argues that accepting this solution requires rejecting Curry's paradox.
Contribution
It introduces a dialetheic approach to the Liar paradox and analyzes objections related to Curry's paradox, providing a novel resolution framework.
Findings
The dialetheic solution successfully resolves the Liar paradox.
Accepting the solution implies rejecting Curry's paradox.
Arguments are discussed defending the rejection of Curry's argument.
Abstract
I present a dialetheic solution to the Antinomy of the Liar and I evaluate the objection that, if the argument in Curry's paradox is valid, accepting this solution forces us to accept an analogous solution to Curry's, which I show to be unacceptable. Thus, to accept this solution, we have to reject the argument in Curry's. I discuss some arguments defending this view.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science · Advanced Algebra and Logic · Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis
