Cryogenic Buffer Gas beams of AlF, CaF, MgF, YbF, Al, Ca, Yb and NO -- a comparison
Sidney C. Wright, Maximilian Doppelbauer, Simon Hofs\"ass, H., Christian Schewe, Boris Sartakov, Gerard Meijer, Stefan Truppe

TL;DR
This study compares cryogenic buffer gas beams of various molecules, revealing differences in brightness, reaction efficiency, and stability, with implications for cold molecule experiments.
Contribution
It provides a direct comparison of molecular beam brightness and reaction dynamics for AlF, CaF, MgF, YbF, and NO, highlighting the effects of different reactants and conditions.
Findings
AlF beam brightness is comparable to atomic beams.
CaF, MgF, YbF beams are significantly dimmer than AlF.
NF$_3$ enhances molecule production efficiency.
Abstract
Cryogenic buffer gas beams are central to many cold molecule experiments. Here, we use absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy to directly compare molecular beams of AlF, CaF, MgF, and YbF molecules, produced by chemical reaction of laser ablated atoms with fluorine rich reagents. The beam brightness for AlF is measured as molecules per steradian per pulse in a single rotational state, comparable to an Al atomic beam produced in the same setup. The CaF, MgF and YbF beams show an order of magnitude lower brightness than AlF, and far below the brightness of Ca and Yb beams. The addition of either NF or SF to the cell extinguishes the Al atomic beam, but has a minimal effect on the Ca and Yb beams. NF reacts more efficiently than SF, as a significantly lower flow rate is required to maximise the molecule production, which is particularly beneficial for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
