The Role of Explanatory Value in Natural Language Processing
Kees van Deemter

TL;DR
This paper advocates for prioritizing explanatory value in NLP, emphasizing that explanation of linguistic phenomena should be central, distinct from model interpretability, and explores implications for research and policy.
Contribution
It introduces the importance of explanatory value in NLP, differentiates it from explainability, and discusses its potential impact on research directions and institutional policies.
Findings
Comparison of recent models of human language production
Discussion on implications of emphasizing explanatory value
Analysis of potential pitfalls in adopting explanatory focus
Abstract
A key aim of science is explanation, yet the idea of explaining language phenomena has taken a backseat in mainstream Natural Language Processing (NLP) and many other areas of Artificial Intelligence. I argue that explanation of linguistic behaviour should be a main goal of NLP, and that this is not the same as making NLP models explainable. To illustrate these ideas, some recent models of human language production are compared with each other. I conclude by asking what it would mean for NLP research and institutional policies if our community took explanatory value seriously, while heeding some possible pitfalls.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopic Modeling · Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) · Natural Language Processing Techniques
