Corrigendum to: Zero divisor gragh of a lattice with respect to an ideal
Ahmed Gaber, Mona Tarek

TL;DR
This paper corrects errors in a previous study on zero divisor graphs of lattices with respect to ideals, providing counterexamples and revised proofs to ensure mathematical accuracy.
Contribution
It identifies and corrects specific inaccuracies in the prior work, including constructing a counterexample and reformulating proofs.
Findings
Counterexample disproves a claimed equality of ideal intersections.
Revised proofs clarify the correct conditions for theorems.
Highlights errors in the original analysis of zero divisor graphs.
Abstract
In this paper, we point out several errors in [M.Afkhami, K.Khashyarmanesh and K.Nafar, Zero divisor graph of a lattice with respect to an ideal, Beitr Algebra Geom (2015), 217-225.]. In the previous article, Afkhami claimed that the intersection of all prime ideals belonging to an ideal I of a distributive lattice L equals to I. In this corrigendum, a counterexample for this sentence is constructed. Afkhami demonstrate a counterexample to a certain theorem which satisfies the necessary and the sufficient condition of the theorem. On the other hand, we reform many proofs in Afkhami's article.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Advanced Topics in Algebra
