Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim Lens Sample from the combination of SOMPZ and clustering and its impact on Cosmology
G. Giannini, A. Alarcon, M. Gatti, A. Porredon, M. Crocce, G. M., Bernstein, R. Cawthon, C. S\'anchez, C. Doux, J. Elvin-Poole, M. Raveri, J., Myles, A. Amon, S. Allam, O. Alves, F. Andrade-Oliveira, E. Baxter, K., Bechtol, M. R. Becker, J. Blazek, H. Camacho, A. Campos

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new redshift calibration method for the DES Y3 lens sample using a combination of Self-Organising Maps and clustering redshifts, improving accuracy and assessing its impact on cosmological constraints.
Contribution
The paper presents a novel redshift calibration approach combining SOMPZ and clustering redshifts, validated on simulations, and evaluates its effect on cosmological parameters.
Findings
New calibration agrees within 3σ of previous results.
Redshift calibration causes a 0.4σ shift in cosmological parameters.
Method improves redshift distribution accuracy for DES Y3 lens sample.
Abstract
We present an alternative calibration of the MagLim lens sample redshift distributions from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) first three years of data (Y3). The new calibration is based on a combination of a Self-Organising Maps based scheme and clustering redshifts to estimate redshift distributions and inherent uncertainties, which is expected to be more accurate than the original DES Y3 redshift calibration of the lens sample. We describe in detail the methodology, we validate it on simulations and discuss the main effects dominating our error budget. The new calibration is in fair agreement with the fiducial DES Y3 redshift distributions calibration, with only mild differences () in the means and widths of the distributions. We study the impact of this new calibration on cosmological constraints, analysing DES Y3 galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
