Infinitary Logic Has No Expressive Efficiency Over Finitary Logic
Matthew Harrison-Trainor, Miles Kretschmer

TL;DR
This paper proves that infinitary logic does not provide any expressive efficiency over finitary logic regarding the complexity of formulas measured by quantifier alternations.
Contribution
It establishes that any elementary first-order formula equivalent to an infinitary formula with n alternations can also be expressed with n alternations in finitary logic.
Findings
Infinitary logic does not simplify the expression of formulas compared to finitary logic.
Equivalent formulas in infinitary logic can be translated into finitary formulas with the same number of quantifier alternations.
The complexity measure based on quantifier alternations remains consistent between infinitary and finitary logic.
Abstract
We can measure the complexity of a logical formula by counting the number of alternations between existential and universal quantifiers. Suppose that an elementary first-order formula (in ) is equivalent to a formula of the infinitary language with alternations of quantifiers. We prove that is equivalent to a finitary formula with alternations of quantifiers. Thus using infinitary logic does not allow us to express a finitary formula in a simpler way.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicssemigroups and automata theory · Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms · Advanced Algebra and Logic
