X-ray luminosity function of high-mass X-ray binaries: Studying the signatures of different physical processes using detailed binary evolution calculations
Devina Misra, Konstantinos Kovlakas, Tassos Fragos, Margaret, Lazzarini, Simone S. Bavera, Bret D. Lehmer, Andreas Zezas, Emmanouil, Zapartas, Zepei Xing, Jeff J. Andrews, Aaron Dotter, Kyle A. Rocha, Philipp, M. Srivastava, and Meng Sun

TL;DR
This study uses detailed binary evolution models to generate synthetic X-ray luminosity functions of high-mass X-ray binaries, revealing how various physical assumptions influence their shape and normalization, and comparing these to observations.
Contribution
It introduces a comprehensive binary population synthesis approach with detailed models to explore the effects of physical assumptions on XLFs, providing insights into binary evolution processes.
Findings
Synthetic XLFs show a break at ~10^38 erg/s, similar to observed XLFs.
Assumptions about supernova kicks, common-envelope physics, and transient behavior significantly affect XLF shape.
Overabundance of XRBs with black hole accretors in models compared to observations.
Abstract
The ever-expanding observational sample of X-ray binaries (XRBs) makes them excellent laboratories for constraining binary evolution theory. Such constraints can be obtained by studying the effects of various physical assumptions on synthetic X-ray luminosity functions (XLFs) and comparing to observed XLFs. In this work, we focus on high-mass XRBs (HMXBs) and study the effects on the XLF of various, poorly-constrained assumptions regarding physical processes such as the common-envelope phase, the core-collapse, and wind-fed accretion. We use the new binary population synthesis code POSYDON, which employs extensive pre-computed grids of detailed stellar structure and binary evolution models, to simulate the evolution of binaries. We generate 96 synthetic XRB populations corresponding to different combinations of model assumptions. The generated HMXB XLFs are feature-rich, deviating from…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis · High-pressure geophysics and materials
