Existential characterizations of monadic NIP
Samuel Braunfeld, Michael C. Laskowski

TL;DR
This paper characterizes monadic NIP theories using existential formulas and establishes equivalences between NIP/stability of classes and their monadic versions, also linking non-monadic NIP to superexponential growth.
Contribution
It provides a new existential characterization of monadic NIP and connects NIP/stability properties of classes to their monadic counterparts, with growth rate implications.
Findings
Non-monadic NIP is witnessed by an existential configuration.
Hereditary classes are NIP/stable iff monadically NIP/stable.
Non-monadic NIP classes have superexponential growth.
Abstract
We show that if a universal theory is not monadically NIP, then this is witnessed by a canonical configuration defined by an existential formula. As a consequence, we show that a hereditary class of relational structures is NIP (resp. stable) if and only if it is monadically NIP (resp. monadically stable). As another consequence, we show that if such a class is not monadically NIP, then it has superexponential growth rate.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
