Extrapolation before imputation reduces bias when imputing censored covariates
Sarah C. Lotspeich, Tanya P. Garcia

TL;DR
This paper introduces a hybrid extrapolation-imputation method that reduces bias in censored covariate imputation, especially under heavy censoring, by extending survival function estimates beyond observed data.
Contribution
It proposes a novel hybrid approach combining semiparametric and parametric models to improve the accuracy of imputing censored covariates in clinical trial data.
Findings
Significantly reduces bias in censored covariate imputation.
Effective even with misspecified parametric extensions.
Enhances patient prioritization for clinical trials.
Abstract
Modeling symptom progression to identify informative subjects for a new Huntington's disease clinical trial is problematic since time to diagnosis, a key covariate, can be heavily censored. Imputation is an appealing strategy where censored covariates are replaced with their conditional means, but existing methods saw over 200% bias under heavy censoring. Calculating these conditional means well requires estimating and then integrating over the survival function of the censored covariate from the censored value to infinity. To estimate the survival function flexibly, existing methods use the semiparametric Cox model with Breslow's estimator, leaving the integrand for the conditional means (the estimated survival function) undefined beyond the observed data. The integral is then estimated up to the largest observed covariate value, and this approximation can cut off the tail of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
