Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
Raluca Jalaboi, Ole Winther, Alfiia Galimzianova

TL;DR
This paper presents ImageQX, an explainable CNN that assesses dermatological image quality and identifies common issues, achieving dermatologist-level performance and facilitating improved teledermatology workflows.
Contribution
Introduction of ImageQX, a lightweight, explainable CNN for image quality assessment and explanation in teledermatology, trained on a large dataset with expert annotations.
Findings
Achieves a macro F1-score of 0.73 for image quality assessment.
Performs comparably to dermatologists in quality evaluation.
Easily deployable on mobile devices due to small size.
Abstract
Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable method for assessing image quality is necessary to improve the current teledermatological consultation flow. We introduce ImageQX, a convolutional neural network for image quality assessment with a learning mechanism for identifying the most common poor image quality explanations: bad framing, bad lighting, blur, low resolution, and distance issues. ImageQX was trained on 26,635 photographs and validated on 9,874 photographs, each annotated with image quality labels and poor image quality explanations by up to 12 board-certified dermatologists. The photographic images were taken between 2017 and 2019 using a mobile skin…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
