The Role Of Biology In Deep Learning
Robert Bain

TL;DR
This paper explores the influence of biological principles on deep learning, demonstrating that weight sparsity alone does not enhance noise robustness and extending continual learning methods with biological insights.
Contribution
It integrates modern neuroscience into deep learning experiments, showing sparsity isn't sufficient for noise robustness and applying biological-inspired methods to complex tasks.
Findings
Sparse networks maintain performance without noise robustness loss
Weight sparsity alone does not improve image noise robustness
Biological-inspired methods extend to more challenging continual learning tasks
Abstract
Artificial neural networks took a lot of inspiration from their biological counterparts in becoming our best machine perceptual systems. This work summarizes some of that history and incorporates modern theoretical neuroscience into experiments with artificial neural networks from the field of deep learning. Specifically, iterative magnitude pruning is used to train sparsely connected networks with 33x fewer weights without loss in performance. These are used to test and ultimately reject the hypothesis that weight sparsity alone improves image noise robustness. Recent work mitigated catastrophic forgetting using weight sparsity, activation sparsity, and active dendrite modeling. This paper replicates those findings, and extends the method to train convolutional neural networks on a more challenging continual learning task. The code has been made publicly available.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCell Image Analysis Techniques
MethodsPruning · Test
