The relation between the Mass Accretion Rate and the Disk Mass in Class I Protostars
Eleonora Fiorellino, Lukasz Tychoniec, Carlo F. Manara, Giovanni, Rosotti, Simone Antoniucci, Fernando Cruz-Saenz de Miera, Agnes Kospal, and, Brunella Nisini

TL;DR
This paper presents the first evidence of a correlation between mass accretion rate and disk mass in Class I protostars, providing insights into early disk evolution and planet formation.
Contribution
It demonstrates a correlation between accretion rate and disk mass in Class I protostars, extending previous findings from Class II stars to earlier evolutionary stages.
Findings
Class I protostars have higher accretion rates and disk masses than Class II stars.
The relation between accretion rate and disk mass in Class I objects has a flatter slope.
Results support models of disk evolution starting in the Class I stage.
Abstract
The evidence of a relation between the mass accretion rate and the disk mass is established for young, Class II pre-main sequence stars. This observational result opened an avenue to test theoretical models and constrain the initial conditions of the disk formation, fundamental in the understanding of the emergence of planetary systems. However, it is becoming clear that the planet formation starts even before the Class II stage, in disks around Class 0 and I protostars. We show for the first time evidence for a correlation between the mass accretion rate and the disk mass for a large sample of Class I young stars located in nearby (< 500 pc) star-forming regions. We fit our sample, finding that the Class I objects relation has a slope flatter than Class II stars, and have higher mass accretion rates and disk masses. The results are put in context of the disk evolution models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
