Distance estimates for AGB stars from parallax measurements
M. Andriantsaralaza, S. Ramstedt, W. H. T Vlemmings, E. De Beck

TL;DR
This study assesses Gaia DR3 parallax accuracy for AGB stars, compares it with VLBI measurements, corrects for biases, and derives improved distances and luminosities, leading to a new Galactic AGB star distance catalog.
Contribution
It provides a statistical correction for Gaia DR3 parallaxes of AGB stars, improving distance estimates and establishing a new bolometric period-luminosity relation.
Findings
Gaia DR3 parallaxes are underestimated by a factor of 5.44 for bright sources.
A Gaia DR3 parallax zero-point offset of -0.077 mas was determined.
Distances derived from Gaia data have significant, asymmetric errors for over 40% of sources.
Abstract
Estimating the distances to asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars using optical measurements of their parallaxes is not straightforward because of the large uncertainties introduced by their dusty envelopes, their large angular sizes, and their surface brightness variability. We compared the parallaxes from Gaia DR3 with parallaxes measured with maser observations with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) to determine a statistical correction factor for the DR3 parallaxes using a sub-sample of 33 maser-emitting oxygen-rich nearby AGB stars. We found that the nominal errors on the Gaia DR3 parallaxes are underestimated by a factor of 5.44 for the brightest sources ( mag). Fainter sources () require a lower parallax error inflation factor of 2.74. We obtain a Gaia DR3 parallax zero-point offset of -0.077 mas for bright AGB stars. The offset becomes more negative for…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
