Malicious aliens and why Caballero's estimates about them should be rejected
Emory Taylor

TL;DR
This paper critiques Caballero's methodology for estimating malicious alien civilizations, arguing that it relies on questionable assumptions and omits key parameters, thus invalidating his estimates.
Contribution
It provides a critical analysis showing why Caballero's estimates about malicious aliens are unreliable and should be rejected.
Findings
Caballero's methodology is based on questionable hypotheses
Key parameters are omitted in his estimates
The paper argues for rejecting his conclusions
Abstract
In a paper by Alberto Caballero, a methodology is stated for estimating the probability of an exoplanet alien civilization having malicious intentions toward the human civilization after being messaged by it and estimating the number of malicious exoplanet civilizations in the Milky Way. Caballero states his paper attempts to provide these estimates. Caballero's methodology uses questionable hypotheses and excludes important parameters, indicating his methodology and estimates should be rejected.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life
