Spectral faux trees
Steve Butler, Elena D'Avanzo, Rachel Heikkinen, Joel Jeffries, Alyssa, Kruczek, Harper Niergarth

TL;DR
This paper explores the existence and construction of spectral faux trees—graphs that are not trees but share the same spectral properties as trees for various matrices, revealing diverse possibilities depending on the matrix type.
Contribution
It provides new insights into spectral faux trees for different matrices, including constructions and limitations, especially for the adjacency and normalized adjacency matrices.
Findings
No spectral faux trees for Laplacian matrix.
Almost all trees are cospectral with a faux tree for adjacency matrix.
Spectral faux trees exist for normalized adjacency when n ≥ 4, with exponential growth in construction.
Abstract
A spectral faux tree with respect to a given matrix is a graph which is not a tree but is cospectral with a tree for the given matrix. We consider the existence of spectral faux trees for several matrices, with emphasis on constructions. For the Laplacian matrix, there are no spectral faux trees. For the adjacency matrix, almost all trees are cospectral with a faux tree. For the signless Laplacian matrix, spectral faux trees can only exist when the number of vertices is of the form . For the normalized adjacency, spectral faux trees exist when the number of vertices , and we give an explicit construction for a family whose size grows exponentially with for where is fixed.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGraph theory and applications · Random Matrices and Applications · Matrix Theory and Algorithms
