TL;DR
This paper classifies the fixed-parameter tractability of counting small subgraphs like matchings and independent sets in large graphs, based on the structural properties of the host graph classes, revealing clear complexity dichotomies.
Contribution
It provides exhaustive complexity classifications for counting problems in restricted graph classes, especially distinguishing between nowhere dense and somewhere dense classes.
Findings
Counting k-matchings is FPT iff the class is nowhere dense.
Counting k-independent sets is FPT iff the class is nowhere dense.
Almost tight lower bounds are established for somewhere dense classes.
Abstract
We study the problems of counting copies and induced copies of a small pattern graph in a large host graph . Recent work fully classified the complexity of those problems according to structural restrictions on the patterns . In this work, we address the more challenging task of analysing the complexity for restricted patterns and restricted hosts. Specifically we ask which families of allowed patterns and hosts imply fixed-parameter tractability, i.e., the existence of an algorithm running in time for some computable function . Our main results present exhaustive and explicit complexity classifications for families that satisfy natural closure properties. Among others, we identify the problems of counting small matchings and independent sets in subgraph-closed graph classes as our central objects of study and establish the following…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
Counting Subgraphs in Somewhere Dense Graphs· youtube
