Comment on "Case for a U(1)pi Quantum Spin Liquid Ground State in the Dipole-Octupole Pyrochlore Ce2Zr2O7" by E. M. Smith et al., Phys. Rev. X 12, 021015 (2022)
S. W. Lovesey

TL;DR
This paper critiques a previous study on the magnetic state of Ce2Zr2O7, highlighting theoretical inaccuracies in the interpretation of neutron scattering data and emphasizing the importance of cerium multipole contributions.
Contribution
It provides essential corrections to the theoretical expressions used in analyzing neutron scattering data for Ce2Zr2O7, challenging prior conclusions about its quantum spin liquid state.
Findings
Previous interpretations are flawed due to missing multipole contributions.
Corrected theory includes cerium multipole effects in scattering intensities.
Reassessment of the magnetic state of Ce2Zr2O7 is necessary.
Abstract
All interpretations of extensive magnetic neutron scattering data in the cited paper are at fault [Phys. Rev. X 12, 021015]. For, the expressions for scattered intensities therein do not contain the cerium multipole whose likely contribution to the magnetic state of the pyrochlore is a principal goal of the published investigation. The Comment includes a brief look at essential corrections to the theory.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Condensed Matter Physics · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Geological and Geochemical Analysis
